← New Search ↗ Social Card

Marco Senerchia Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-07-04 Country: USA
Brown
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 New Hampton NE-Prep 35 3 13 16 0.457 0.0906 0.0906 0.2083 0.2083
2023-24 St. Georges NE-Prep 28 10 23 33 1.179 0.2335 0.2335 0.5370 0.5370
2024-25 Chicago Steel USHL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.1180 0.1249 0.6007 0.6356
2025-26 Chicago Steel USHL 56 4 18 22 0.393 0.2318 0.2341 1.1800 1.1916
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

88%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3310
Defenseman overall
#465
Defenseman born in 2007

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Michigan (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ Maine (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Boston University (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Brown Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2018-19
0.29
actual FR PPG at Brown
SHL 2025-26
0.12
actual FR PPG at Brown
EHL 2014-15
0.15
actual FR PPG at Brown
USHL 2023-24
0.39
actual FR PPG at Brown

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-River Falls · 2002-03
0.850 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2011-12
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Middlebury · 2021-22
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.