IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Carl Bombardier Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1990-01-23 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Northern Manitoba Blizzard MJHL 58 0 10 10 0.172 0.0469 0.0475 0.1086 0.1099
2009-10 Northern Manitoba Blizzard MJHL 61 7 13 20 0.328 0.0892 0.0863 0.2066 0.1999
2010-11 Northern Manitoba Blizzard MJHL 58 2 20 22 0.379 0.1031 0.0947 0.2390 0.2196
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen SR 18 2 2 4 0.222
2013-14 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen JR 13 0 0 0 0.000
2012-13 Wisconsin-Stout D3 — SO 8 2 0 2 0.250
2011-12 Wisconsin-Stout D3 — FR 10 1 1 2 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2011-12 · Wisconsin-Stout
+132.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#19359
Defenseman overall
#1788
Defenseman born in 1990
#1690
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matt Wilkins
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2011-12
0.133 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Darin Pandovski
Elmira · 2005-06
0.154 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Larry Niland
Elmira · 2018-19
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.