IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Darin Pandovski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-01-20 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Georgetown Raiders OJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2004-05 Port Hope Predators OJHL 48 14 29 43 0.896 0.2503 0.2317 0.6182 0.5723
2005-06 North York Rangers OJHL 47 18 49 67 1.425 0.3983 0.3541 0.9837 0.8745
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2006-07 Elmira D3 — FR 13 1 1 2 0.154
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.15
2006-07 · Elmira
-41.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8128
Forward overall
#281
Forward born in 1985
#263
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Perry D'Arrisso
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cole Woodliffe
Northland · 2017-18
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ross Oldcorn
Manhattanville · 2001-02
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Shane Remenda
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2002-03
0.655 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.