IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt Wilkins Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-01-26 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 37 7 18 25 0.676 0.2517 0.2536 0.9846 0.9920
2010-11 Brooks Bandits AJHL 60 30 47 77 1.283 0.4258 0.4092 1.1894 1.1429
2011-12 Brooks Bandits AJHL 60 34 65 99 1.650 0.5475 0.4983 1.5292 1.3918
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Union D1 ECAC SR 35 7 14 21 0.600
2014-15 Union D1 ECAC JR 34 13 15 28 0.824
2013-14 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 — SO 16 0 0 0 0.000
2013-14 Union D1 ECAC SO 40 6 14 20 0.500
2012-13 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 — FR 15 0 2 2 0.133
2012-13 Union D1 ECAC FR 37 3 13 16 0.432
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.40
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.13
2012-13 · Milwaukee School of Engineering
-66.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7166
Forward overall
#303
Forward born in 1991

D1 Comparables

Trevor Mingoia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Union (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Shane Sooth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alex Ochterbeck
Curry · 2017-18
0.654 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mitch Stephens
SUNY Geneseo · 2002-03
1.077 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
A.J. Shiverdecker
Westfield State · 2007-08
1.208 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.