IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Keiton Klein Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-03-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Steele County Blades USPHL-Premier 16 7 11 18 1.125 0.1269 0.1269 0.3827 0.3827
2021-22 Battlefords North Stars SJHL 41 8 17 25 0.610 0.1562 0.1533 0.4519 0.4434
2022-23 Battlefords North Stars SJHL 52 17 20 37 0.712 0.1823 0.1698 0.5273 0.4910
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Trine D3 NCHA GR 11 4 1 5 0.455
2024-25 Trine D3 NCHA SR 7 2 0 2 0.286
2023-24 Trine D3 NCHA JR 12 2 3 5 0.417
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2023-24 · Trine
+198.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22152
Forward overall
#1219
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kevin Michelcavage
Concordia (WI) · 2011-12
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dante Hahn
Concordia (WI) · 2015-16
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Patrick
Stevenson · 2017-18
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.