IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cale Strasky Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-06-07 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Yorkton Terriers SJHL 40 0 3 3 0.075 0.0192 0.0200 0.0556 0.0579
2022-23 Yorkton Terriers SJHL 54 0 9 9 0.167 0.0427 0.0423 0.1235 0.1223
2023-24 Northern Manitoba Blizzard MJHL 54 2 7 9 0.167 0.0321 0.0299 0.1051 0.0980
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Adrian ACHA_D1 — — 36 2 19 21 0.583
2024-25 Adrian ACHA_D1 — — 36 2 19 21 0.583
2023-24 Adrian ACHA_D1 — — 36 2 19 21 0.583
2022-23 Adrian ACHA_D1 — — 36 2 19 21 0.583
2021-22 Adrian ACHA_D1 — — 36 2 19 21 0.583
2020-21 Adrian ACHA_D1 — — 36 2 19 21 0.583

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
75%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27484
Defenseman overall
#4166
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Grady Friedman
UMass Boston · 2021-22
0.320 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Paul Forselius
Salve Regina · 2005-06
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Hunter Gunski
Utica · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.