IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cameron Wilson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-09-09 Country: USA
Lindenwood
Ind. D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Madison Capitols USHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2025-26 Philadelphia Rebels NAHL 53 5 6 11 0.207 0.0762 0.0847 0.2190 0.2436
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
57%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#50427
Forward overall
#1049
Forward born in 2008

D1 Comparables

Blake Christensen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ American International (0.64 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Connor Hurley
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Biagio Lerario
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jack Billings
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Niagara
0.16 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Humitz
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Strong
NCAAe PPG

Lindenwood Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Shane LaVelle
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.20
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood
Caige Sterzer
BCHL 2017-18
0.42
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood
Jacob Fletcher
NE-Prep 2022-23
0.89
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood
Louis-Philippe Fontaine
QMJHL 2021-22
0.70
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood

D2/3 Comparables

Patrick Choi
Connecticut College · 2015-16
0.235 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Westlund
Gustavus Adolphus · 2017-18
0.522 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Gianni Mangone
Marian · 2010-11
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.