← New Search ↗ Social Card

Caige Sterzer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-08-08 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Surrey Eagles BCHL 45 2 11 13 0.289 0.1076 0.1172 0.4210 0.4587
2018-19 Surrey Eagles BCHL 55 5 12 17 0.309 0.1151 0.1192 0.4504 0.4664
2019-20 Alberni Valley Bulldogs BCHL 54 9 17 26 0.481 0.1794 0.1794 0.7016 0.7016
2020-21 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 27 3 3 6 0.222 0.0880 0.0880 0.2333 0.2333
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Thomas D1 CCHA SR 34 4 11 15 0.441
2024-25 St. Thomas D1 CCHA 38 6 8 14 0.368
2023-24 Lindenwood D1 CCHA 28 8 14 22 0.786
2022-23 Lindenwood D1 CCHA 26 6 5 11 0.423
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2022-23 · Lindenwood
+317.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
88%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#41841
Forward overall
#2299
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Neumann · 2003-04
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2009-10
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern Maine · 2003-04
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.