IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Émile Tremblay Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-10-22 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Estevan Bruins SJHL 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.1281 0.1293 0.3705 0.3740
2023-24 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 33 7 6 13 0.394 0.0576 0.0567 0.1931 0.1902
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Westfield State D3 MASCAC — 27 4 10 14 0.518
2024-25 Westfield State D3 MASCAC — 25 7 4 11 0.440
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2024-25 · Westfield State
+499.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#38774
Forward overall
#2419
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Michael Schaber
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2009-10
0.318 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Carson Gray
Wisconsin-Stout · 2011-12
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Austin Aksoy
Lake Forest · 2015-16
0.143 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.