IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Travis Poliski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-01-11 Country: USA
Bowling Green
CCHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2025-26 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 35 1 1 2 0.057 0.0337 0.0349 0.1715 0.1777
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
57%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#60789
Forward overall
#1469
Forward born in 2008
#4222
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Bryan Basilico
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jason Cotton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Eastman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bo Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Félix Caron
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ RPI (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong
NCAAe PPG

Bowling Green Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Brett Pfoh
BCHL 2019-20
0.21
actual FR PPG at Bowling Green
Johannes Løkkeberg
SuperElit 2021-22
0.00
actual FR PPG at Bowling Green
Evan Dougherty
USHL 2016-17
0.00
actual FR PPG at Bowling Green
Jérémie Minville
QMJHL 2021-22
0.30
actual FR PPG at Bowling Green

D2/3 Comparables

Shane Bernhardson
Concordia · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Murphy
Curry · 2000-01
0.526 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cameron Croteau
Lebanon Valley · 2018-19
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.