IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brendan DeFeo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-08-26 Country: USA
Vermont
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2025-26 Alberni Valley Bulldogs BCHL 29 3 17 20 0.690 0.2657 0.2804 1.0037 1.0593
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
48%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20638
Forward overall
#621
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

Zach Aston-Reese
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Osterberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Thomas Ebbing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Grant Besse
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
Justin Greenberg
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Miami (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Vermont Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Max Strand
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.67
actual FR PPG at Vermont
Isak Walther
SHL-J20 2019-20
0.23
actual FR PPG at Vermont
Ross Colton
USHL 2014-15
0.82
actual FR PPG at Vermont
Matt Cato
NCDC 2021-22
0.00
actual FR PPG at Vermont

D2/3 Comparables

Pat Egan
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2012-13
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Braccini
Bethel · 2019-20
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jonny Mulera
Salve Regina · 2017-18
1.409 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.