← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brendan DeFeo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-08-26 Country: USA
Vermont
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2025-26 Alberni Valley Bulldogs BCHL 29 3 17 20 0.690 0.2657 0.2804 1.0031 1.0586
2026-27 Alberni Valley Bulldogs BCHL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.0771 0.0771 0.2909 0.2909
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
48%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20957
Forward overall
#658
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Vermont Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2019-20
0.08
actual FR PPG at Vermont
USHS-MN 2021-22
0.41
actual FR PPG at Vermont
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.29
actual FR PPG at Vermont
EHL 2014-15
0.00
actual FR PPG at Vermont

D2/3 Comparables

Curry · 2018-19
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Canton · 2017-18
0.682 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2023-24
0.471 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.