← New Search ↗ Social Card

Carter McLeod Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-02-02 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Neepawa Titans MJHL 46 13 20 33 0.717 0.1381 0.1406 0.4521 0.4601
2023-24 Neepawa Titans MJHL 52 14 18 32 0.615 0.1185 0.1144 0.3878 0.3744
2024-25 Neepawa Titans MJHL 34 7 15 22 0.647 0.1246 0.1134 0.4078 0.3712
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Adrian ACHA_D1 22 5 7 12 0.545
2024-25 Adrian ACHA_D1 22 5 7 12 0.545
2023-24 Adrian ACHA_D1 22 5 7 12 0.545
2022-23 Adrian ACHA_D1 22 5 7 12 0.545
2021-22 Adrian ACHA_D1 22 5 7 12 0.545
2020-21 Adrian ACHA_D1 22 5 7 12 0.545

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
65%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31737
Forward overall
#1892
Forward born in 2004
#522
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nichols · 2015-16
0.700 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Becker · 2016-17
0.292 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Franklin Pierce · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.