IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cooper Fredericks Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-08-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Soo Eagles NOJHL 29 12 6 18 0.621 0.1057 0.1037 0.2631 0.2581
2024-25 Soo Eagles NOJHL 46 33 36 69 1.500 0.2555 0.2386 0.6357 0.5937
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Liberty University ACHA_D1 — — 2 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Liberty University ACHA_D1 — — 2 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Liberty University ACHA_D1 — — 2 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Liberty University ACHA_D1 — — 2 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Liberty University ACHA_D1 — — 2 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Liberty University ACHA_D1 — — 2 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#26406
Forward overall
#1500
Forward born in 2004
#246
in NOJHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Samodral
Chatham · 2023-24
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Emil Elias
New England College · 2024-25
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Trevor Bayda
St. Norbert · 2002-03
0.467 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.