← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cooper Fredericks Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-08-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Soo Eagles NOJHL 29 12 6 18 0.621 0.1037 0.1017 0.2584 0.2535
2024-25 Soo Eagles NOJHL 46 33 36 69 1.500 0.2505 0.2339 0.6244 0.5831
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Liberty University ACHA_D1 2 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Liberty University ACHA_D1 2 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Liberty University ACHA_D1 2 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Liberty University ACHA_D1 2 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Liberty University ACHA_D1 2 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Liberty University ACHA_D1 2 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#26362
Forward overall
#1500
Forward born in 2004
#231
in NOJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nichols · 2011-12
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2017-18
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamline · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.