← New Search ↗ Social Card

Landon Pappas Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-08-13 Country: Canada
Bemidji State
CCHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Drumheller Dragons AJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Nipawin Hawks SJHL 55 6 23 29 0.527 0.1351 0.1422 0.3975 0.4183
2024-25 Fargo Force USHL 6 0 0 0 0.000
2025-26 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 49 8 31 39 0.796 0.3067 0.2925 1.1583 1.1046
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
20%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4482
Defenseman overall
#1152
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG

Bemidji State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

SHL 2025-26
0.69
actual FR PPG at Bemidji State
BCHL 2012-13
0.00
actual FR PPG at Bemidji State
NAHL 2021-22
0.15
actual FR PPG at Bemidji State
NAHL 2016-17
0.00
actual FR PPG at Bemidji State

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2008-09
0.920 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2006-07
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Bethel · 2008-09
0.960 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.