| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007-08 | Pembroke Lumber Kings | CCHL | 7 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.286 | 0.0815 | 0.0915 | 0.2212 | 0.2484 |
| 2008-09 | Pembroke Lumber Kings | CCHL | 25 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 0.440 | 0.1256 | 0.1337 | 0.3406 | 0.3626 |
| 2009-10 | Pembroke Lumber Kings | CCHL | 61 | 17 | 26 | 43 | 0.705 | 0.2012 | 0.2049 | 0.5457 | 0.5558 |
| 2010-11 | Pembroke Lumber Kings | CCHL | 62 | 26 | 39 | 65 | 1.048 | 0.2992 | 0.2899 | 0.8116 | 0.7865 |
| 2011-12 | Pembroke Lumber Kings | CCHL | 48 | 17 | 24 | 41 | 0.854 | 0.2438 | 0.2237 | 0.6612 | 0.6068 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-16 | Neumann | D3 | MAC | SR | 27 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 0.630 |
| 2014-15 | Neumann | D3 | MAC | JR | 23 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 0.391 |
| 2013-14 | Neumann | D3 | MAC | SO | 24 | 6 | 2 | 8 | 0.333 |
| 2012-13 | Neumann | D3 | MAC | FR | 24 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 0.292 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.