← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brandon Gagné Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-07-08 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 7 2 0 2 0.286 0.0620 0.0696 0.2210 0.2482
2008-09 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 25 5 6 11 0.440 0.0954 0.1016 0.3404 0.3624
2009-10 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 61 17 26 43 0.705 0.1529 0.1557 0.5454 0.5555
2010-11 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 62 26 39 65 1.048 0.2274 0.2204 0.8111 0.7860
2011-12 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 48 17 24 41 0.854 0.1853 0.1701 0.6609 0.6065
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Neumann D3 MAC SR 27 7 10 17 0.630
2014-15 Neumann D3 MAC JR 23 3 6 9 0.391
2013-14 Neumann D3 MAC SO 24 6 2 8 0.333
2012-13 Neumann D3 MAC FR 24 2 5 7 0.292
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2012-13 · Neumann
+79.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#17866
Forward overall
#668
Forward born in 1991
#275
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Plattsburgh · 2006-07
0.900 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hobart · 2015-16
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2006-07
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.