IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dante Josefsson Westling Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-08-18 Country: Sweden
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Signed Professionally
Örebro HK · SHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Örebro HK U20 SHL-J20 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2023-24 Örebro HK U20 SuperElit 42 13 2 15 0.357 0.1409 0.1495 0.4920 0.5219
2024-25 Örebro HK U20 SuperElit 47 25 33 58 1.234 0.4869 0.4920 1.7001 1.7179
2025-26 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 62 17 19 36 0.581 0.3425 0.3309 1.7422 1.6829
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

70%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6132
Forward overall
#144
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

Max McHugh
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Strong
NCAAe PPG
C.J. Reuschlein
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Army (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Thomas Forgione
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Vermont (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Judd Peterson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kevin Irwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Vermont (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Busby
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2002-03
0.903 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Bud Winter
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2017-18
1.091 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Pat Egan
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2013-14
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.