← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jonathan Demme Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1991-04-04 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Brampton Capitals OJHL 45 2 14 16 0.356 0.1068 0.1124 0.2434 0.2562
2009-10 OJHL 40 1 8 9 0.225 0.0676 0.0676 0.1540 0.1540
2010-11 Villanova Knights OJHL 38 2 10 12 0.316 0.0949 0.0905 0.2162 0.2061
2011-12 Caledon Admirals OJHL 39 5 12 17 0.436 0.1309 0.1190 0.2984 0.2713
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 SUNY Brockport D3 SR 16 1 3 4 0.250
2014-15 SUNY Brockport D3 JR 23 0 4 4 0.174
2013-14 SUNY Brockport D3 SO 25 1 2 3 0.120
2012-13 SUNY Brockport D3 FR 20 1 1 2 0.100
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.10
2012-13 · SUNY Brockport
-1.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16244
Defenseman overall
#1631
Defenseman born in 1991
#3820
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Thomas · 2012-13
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2009-10
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2012-13
0.280 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.