IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dennis Playfair Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-08-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 48 2 10 12 0.250 0.0613 0.0623 0.1711 0.1740
2010-11 — OJHL 45 2 13 15 0.333 0.0817 0.0793 0.2281 0.2213
2011-12 — OJHL 42 0 6 6 0.143 0.0350 0.0324 0.0978 0.0906
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 SUNY Geneseo D3 — SR 11 0 1 1 0.091
2012-13 SUNY Geneseo D3 — FR 2 0 1 1 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2012-13 · SUNY Geneseo
+1041.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#53458
Forward overall
#1944
Forward born in 1991
#4227
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Spencer Carter
Elmira · 2015-16
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Wilkinson
Fredonia · 2011-12
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Aaron Berman
Wisconsin-Superior · 2004-05
0.214 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.