← New Search ↗ Social Card

Spencer Carter Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-08-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Hartford Jr. Wolfpack EHL 22 0 0 0 0.000
2014-15 Hartford Jr. Wolfpack EHL 39 5 12 17 0.436 0.0638 0.0642 0.2135 0.2149
2015-16 Hartford Jr. Wolfpack EHL 37 1 19 20 0.540 0.0791 0.0761 0.2647 0.2548
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Elmira D1 UCHC SR 25 1 7 8 0.320
2019-20 Elmira D3 UCHC SR 25 1 7 8 0.320
2018-19 Elmira D1 UCHC JR 18 0 4 4 0.222
2018-19 Elmira D3 UCHC JR 18 0 4 4 0.222
2017-18 Elmira D3 UCHC SO 23 1 3 4 0.174
2016-17 Elmira D3 UCHC FR 12 0 2 2 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2016-17 · Elmira
+147.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12346
Defenseman overall
#1652
Defenseman born in 1995
#1581
in EHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Plymouth State · 2021-22
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Brockport · 2023-24
0.210 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
New England College · 2024-25
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.