← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sullivan Miller Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-03-19 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Bemidji State
CCHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Oklahoma Warriors NAHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Janesville Jets NAHL 50 10 17 27 0.540 0.1984 0.2058 0.5700 0.5914
2025-26 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 57 15 12 27 0.474 0.2794 0.2641 1.4227 1.3447
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20152
Forward overall
#882
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.85 PPG
→ Miami (0.71 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Maine (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG

Bemidji State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2021-22
0.38
actual FR PPG at Bemidji State
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.19
actual FR PPG at Bemidji State
USHS-MN 2021-22
0.19
actual FR PPG at Bemidji State
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.86
actual FR PPG at Bemidji State

D2/3 Comparables

Roger Williams · 2024-25
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamilton · 2011-12
1.091 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2015-16
1.074 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.