IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Justin Selep Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-09-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Pittsburgh Jr. Penguins NA3HL 42 13 6 19 0.452 0.0500 0.0517 0.1433 0.1483
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Michigan State D1 BigTen — 1 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 Suffolk D3 CNE — 25 17 11 28 1.120
2014-15 Suffolk D3 CNE — 26 11 11 22 0.846
2013-14 Nazareth D3 UCHC — 4 0 1 1 0.250
2012-13 Nazareth D3 UCHC — 20 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#45709
Forward overall
#1727
Forward born in 1992
#2705
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Ryan Fitzgerald
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cédric Lacroix
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Mansfield
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bo Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Gage Torrel
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Niko Benjamin
Norwich · 2022-23
0.586 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ben Lauder
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2007-08
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Perron
Nichols · 2016-17
0.783 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.