IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Thomas Corneillie Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-03-14 Country: USA
Western Michigan
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 57 5 15 20 0.351 0.1289 0.1401 0.3709 0.4031
2025-26 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 59 6 11 17 0.288 0.1700 0.1691 0.8645 0.8597
2026-27 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 7 0 2 2 0.286 0.1685 0.1685 0.8573 0.8573
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

65%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9801
Defenseman overall
#1384
Defenseman born in 2007

D1 Comparables

Vinny Muto
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Niagara (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Max Everson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Harvard (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Victor Björkung
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Joseph Fiala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Western Michigan Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Luke Witkowski
SHL 2025-26
0.19
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan
Aidan Fulp
USHL 2019-20
0.44
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan
Jacob Napier
USHL 2022-23
0.17
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan
Michael Joyaux
USHL 2016-17
0.20
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan

D2/3 Comparables

A.J. Tucker
St. Scholastica · 2003-04
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Shane Baker
Skidmore · 2023-24
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Chance Gorman
Elmira · 2018-19
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.