IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Thomas Corneillie Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-03-14 Country: USA
Western Michigan
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 57 5 15 20 0.351 0.1289 0.1401 0.3704 0.4026
2025-26 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 59 6 11 17 0.288 0.1700 0.1691 0.8653 0.8605
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

80%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9639
Defenseman overall
#1323
Defenseman born in 2007

D1 Comparables

Tim Davison
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Garret Cockerill
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Clay Anderson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Harvard (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Justin Woods
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Zach Frye
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Western Michigan Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Ronnie Attard
USHL 2017-18
0.47
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan
Luke Witkowski
SHL 2025-26
0.19
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan
Paul Stoykewych
BCHL 2013-14
0.00
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan
Aidan Fulp
USHL 2018-19
0.44
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan

D2/3 Comparables

David Italiano
Williams · 2011-12
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Dom Murphy
University of New England · 2019-20
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Stratton
Skidmore · 2023-24
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.