IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dan Hussey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1981-10-16 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Portage Terriers MJHL 53 2 12 14 0.264 0.0509 0.0506 0.1666 0.1656
2001-02 Portage Terriers MJHL 57 6 28 34 0.597 0.1148 0.1073 0.3762 0.3516
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Colorado ACHA_D1 — — 9 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 University of Colorado ACHA_D1 — — 9 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 University of Colorado ACHA_D1 — — 9 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 University of Colorado ACHA_D1 — — 9 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 University of Colorado ACHA_D1 — — 9 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 University of Colorado ACHA_D1 — — 9 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#13557
Defenseman overall
#846
Defenseman born in 1981
#1006
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jérémy Tremblay
Albertus Magnus · 2022-23
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Lonny Forrester
St. Norbert · 2002-03
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan McIntyre
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2005-06
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.