← New Search ↗ Social Card

Freddie Schneider Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2009-02-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Edina USHS-MN 31 13 14 27 0.871 0.1103 0.1103 0.2116 0.2116
2024-25 Edina USHS-MN 31 14 30 44 1.419 0.1797 0.1797 0.3448 0.3448
2025-26 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 44 10 14 24 0.545 0.4055 0.4104 2.0355 2.0600
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

90%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13192
Forward overall
#36
Forward born in 2009

D1 Comparables

NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Average
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Yale (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.81 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Minnesota
0.32 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Albertus Magnus · 2017-18
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Boston · 2013-14
1.600 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Salem State · 2006-07
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.