IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Craig Carlyle Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1984-02-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Winnipeg Blues MJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2001-02 Winnipeg Blues MJHL 52 4 5 9 0.173 0.0333 0.0350 0.1091 0.1146
2004-05 Aurora Tigers OJHL 42 5 24 29 0.691 0.1692 0.1486 0.4749 0.4170
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2007-08 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC SO 22 2 6 8 0.364
2006-07 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC SO 12 1 1 2 0.167
2005-06 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC FR 4 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#11628
Defenseman overall
#1114
Defenseman born in 1984

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Minerva
Neumann · 2016-17
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Antonio Demacopoulos
Fredonia · 2018-19
0.273 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Niko Happo
Manhattanville · 2017-18
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.