← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cooper Simon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-09-20 Country: USA
Western Michigan
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Brookfield (Wis.) USHS-MN 3 3 4 7 2.333 0.2954 0.2954 0.5668 0.5668
2024-25 Wisconsin Windigo NAHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2025-26 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 31 6 4 10 0.323 0.1903 0.1942 0.9689 0.9888
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
32%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28662
Forward overall
#978
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG

Western Michigan Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan
USHS-MN 2023-24
0.62
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.95
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.00
actual FR PPG at Western Michigan

D2/3 Comparables

Augsburg · 2014-15
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Augsburg · 2014-15
0.609 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2006-07
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.