IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Shane Auger Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1984-02-15 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2001-02 Waywayseecappo Wolverines MJHL 6 1 0 1 0.167 0.0472 0.0496 0.1050 0.1104
2002-03 Waywayseecappo Wolverines MJHL 39 7 9 16 0.410 0.1161 0.1174 0.2585 0.2613
2003-04 Waywayseecappo Wolverines MJHL 58 15 29 44 0.759 0.2146 0.2070 0.4780 0.4610
2004-05 Waywayseecappo Wolverines MJHL 56 10 30 40 0.714 0.2021 0.1853 0.4501 0.4128
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 St. Scholastica D3 — SR 10 0 1 1 0.100
2007-08 St. Scholastica D3 — JR 25 0 2 2 0.080
2006-07 St. Scholastica D3 — SO 26 1 4 5 0.192
2005-06 St. Scholastica D3 — FR 14 0 3 3 0.214
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.21
2005-06 · St. Scholastica
+17.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#4758
Defenseman overall
#757
Defenseman born in 1984
#610
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Drew Brevig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
John Rey
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Minerva
Neumann · 2016-17
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Saler
St. Scholastica · 2004-05
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Thomas Williams
St. Thomas · 2009-10
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.