IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cory Baldwin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-09-08 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2001-02 Selkirk Steelers MJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2003-04 Dauphin Kings MJHL 44 14 7 21 0.477 0.1298 0.1353 0.3008 0.3136
2004-05 Dauphin Kings MJHL 63 35 28 63 1.000 0.2719 0.2706 0.6302 0.6272
2005-06 Dauphin Kings MJHL 58 16 25 41 0.707 0.1922 0.1814 0.4455 0.4204
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2006-07 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 — FR 29 3 3 6 0.207
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.21
2006-07 · Wisconsin-River Falls
+11.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#27658
Forward overall
#859
Forward born in 1985
#480
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Zachary Lokey
New England · 2009-10
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Blair Falotico
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2009-10
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Burnett
SUNY Geneseo · 2017-18
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.