IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cory Baldwin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-09-08 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2001-02 Selkirk Steelers MJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2003-04 Dauphin Kings MJHL 44 14 7 21 0.477 0.0919 0.0958 0.3010 0.3138
2004-05 Dauphin Kings MJHL 63 35 28 63 1.000 0.1925 0.1916 0.6306 0.6276
2005-06 Dauphin Kings MJHL 58 16 25 41 0.707 0.1361 0.1284 0.4458 0.4207
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2006-07 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen FR 29 3 3 6 0.207
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.21
2006-07 · Wisconsin-River Falls
+57.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#27886
Forward overall
#873
Forward born in 1985
#372
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Carter Schram
Suffolk · 2022-23
0.391 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendon Manning
Saint Anselm · 2023-24
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Zachary Lokey
University of New England · 2009-10
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.