IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dylan Carter Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-05-24 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Toronto Patriots OJHL 6 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2010-11 Toronto Patriots OJHL 44 5 10 15 0.341 0.0836 0.0886 0.2347 0.2489
2011-12 Toronto Patriots OJHL 13 2 7 9 0.692 0.1697 0.1724 0.4766 0.4843
2012-13 Toronto Patriots OJHL 48 14 19 33 0.688 0.1685 0.1628 0.4733 0.4573
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Hobart D3 SUNYAC — 2 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#31119
Forward overall
#1063
Forward born in 1993
#1670
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tanner Pond
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

David Titanic
SUNY Oswego · 2009-10
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Logan Isley
Wisconsin-Superior · 2005-06
0.815 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Davis Ross
Marian · 2014-15
0.786 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.