IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

J.T. Walters Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-05-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Lindsay Muskies OJHL 52 1 5 6 0.115 0.0283 0.0288 0.0794 0.0807
2013-14 Espanola Rivermen NOJHL 38 5 19 24 0.632 0.1076 0.1055 0.2677 0.2626
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC — 23 2 5 7 0.304
2016-17 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC — 13 0 1 1 0.077
2015-16 Bethel D3 MIAC — 22 2 6 8 0.364
2014-15 Bethel D3 MIAC — 25 6 3 9 0.360
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2014-15 · Bethel
+409.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#17652
Defenseman overall
#1950
Defenseman born in 1994
#3517
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Cameron McDonald
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Victor Björkung
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Steve Hoffart
Manhattanville · 2000-01
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nico Gonzalez
SUNY Cortland · 2014-15
0.524 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Adamsons
Connecticut College · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.