| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-10 | Carleton Place Canadians | CCHL | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1.000 | 0.2169 | 0.2412 | 0.7741 | 0.8608 |
| 2010-11 | Carleton Place Canadians | CCHL | 59 | 12 | 10 | 22 | 0.373 | 0.0809 | 0.0860 | 0.2887 | 0.3068 |
| 2011-12 | Carleton Place Canadians | CCHL | 62 | 15 | 18 | 33 | 0.532 | 0.1155 | 0.1168 | 0.4121 | 0.4167 |
| 2012-13 | Carleton Place Canadians | CCHL | 59 | 12 | 13 | 25 | 0.424 | 0.0919 | 0.0889 | 0.3280 | 0.3172 |
| 2013-14 | Carleton Place Canadians | CCHL | 62 | 12 | 17 | 29 | 0.468 | 0.1014 | 0.0930 | 0.3620 | 0.3321 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-18 | Utica | D3 | UCHC | SR | 27 | 10 | 19 | 29 | 1.074 |
| 2016-17 | Utica | D3 | UCHC | JR | 27 | 7 | 15 | 22 | 0.815 |
| 2015-16 | Utica | D3 | UCHC | SO | 28 | 7 | 12 | 19 | 0.679 |
| 2014-15 | Utica | D3 | UCHC | FR | 21 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 0.381 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.