← New Search ↗ Social Card

Anthony McVeigh Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-05-21 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 2 2 0 2 1.000 0.2169 0.2412 0.7660 0.8518
2010-11 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 59 12 10 22 0.373 0.0809 0.0860 0.2856 0.3035
2011-12 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 62 15 18 33 0.532 0.1155 0.1168 0.4077 0.4123
2012-13 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 59 12 13 25 0.424 0.0919 0.0889 0.3246 0.3139
2013-14 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 62 12 17 29 0.468 0.1014 0.0930 0.3583 0.3287
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Utica D3 UCHC SR 27 10 19 29 1.074
2016-17 Utica D3 UCHC JR 27 7 15 22 0.815
2015-16 Utica D3 UCHC SO 28 7 12 19 0.679
2014-15 Utica D3 UCHC FR 21 4 4 8 0.381
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2014-15 · Utica
+387.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#37403
Forward overall
#1318
Forward born in 1993
#917
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Concordia · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Finlandia · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2011-12
0.263 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.