IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Ralph Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-07-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 New Jersey Jr. Titans EHL 38 5 6 11 0.289 0.0669 0.0637 0.1417 0.1349
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Canton D3 SUNYAC SR 24 4 5 9 0.375
2016-17 Canton D3 SUNYAC JR 20 1 4 5 0.250
2015-16 Canton D3 SUNYAC SO 21 4 4 8 0.381
2014-15 Canton D3 SUNYAC FR 21 2 6 8 0.381
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2014-15 · Canton
+599.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#46643
Forward overall
#1730
Forward born in 1993
#2079
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kyle Warneke
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2007-08
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Vincent Currao
Aurora · 2014-15
0.143 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
T.J. Koufis
St. Norbert · 2021-22
0.296 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.