← New Search ↗ Social Card

T.J. Koufis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-07-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Madison Capitols USHL 28 1 1 2 0.071 0.0421 0.0447 0.2144 0.2279
2019-20 Cobourg Cougars OJHL 44 15 20 35 0.795 0.1950 0.1950 0.5477 0.5477
2020-21 NAHL 36 6 4 10 0.278 0.1021 0.1021 0.2932 0.2932
2021-22 NAHL 53 6 18 24 0.453 0.1664 0.1586 0.4779 0.4554
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SR 30 8 18 26 0.867
2024-25 St. Norbert D3 NCHA JR 30 6 9 15 0.500
2023-24 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SO 29 14 6 20 0.690
2022-23 St. Norbert D3 NCHA FR 27 4 4 8 0.296
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2022-23 · St. Norbert
+206.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#32838
Forward overall
#1765
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Fredonia · 2014-15
0.958 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2017-18
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wilkes · 2021-22
0.368 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.