← New Search ↗ Social Card

Carter Frankiw Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-10-29 Country: Canada
Alaska Fairbanks
Ind. D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Lloydminster Bobcats AJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Lloydminster Bobcats AJHL 36 2 3 5 0.139 0.0466 0.0511 0.1285 0.1409
2023-24 Surrey Eagles BCHL 36 3 7 10 0.278 0.1070 0.1125 0.4043 0.4250
2024-25 Surrey Eagles BCHL 4 2 3 5 1.250 0.4816 0.4821 1.8191 1.8209
2025-26 Chicago Steel USHL 18 0 4 4 0.222 0.1311 0.1214 0.6674 0.6179
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
25%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16271
Defenseman overall
#3035
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

Alaska Fairbanks Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2020-21
0.17
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.06
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.11
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.25
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2013-14
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2021-22
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2024-25
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.