IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jarrett Kup Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1993-03-31 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Seguin Bruins OJHL 45 0 4 4 0.089 0.0218 0.0240 0.0612 0.0673
2012-13 Collingwood Blues OJHL 33 0 2 2 0.061 0.0149 0.0143 0.0417 0.0400
2013-14 Collingwood Blues OJHL 53 2 25 27 0.509 0.1249 0.1134 0.3507 0.3184
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Curry D3 CNE SR 26 11 8 19 0.731
2016-17 Curry D3 CNE JR 26 4 13 17 0.654
2015-16 Curry D3 CNE SO 18 0 5 5 0.278
2014-15 Curry D3 CNE FR 20 1 7 8 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2014-15 · Curry
+474.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#20210
Defenseman overall
#1926
Defenseman born in 1993
#3879
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Justin Hess
Nazareth · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Raguseo
SUNY Oswego · 2012-13
0.450 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick D'Avolio
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2011-12
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.