IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Evan Marek Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-06-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 — EHL 41 2 11 13 0.317 0.0464 0.0440 0.1553 0.1473
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 SR 26 1 5 6 0.231
2016-17 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 JR 23 4 2 6 0.261
2015-16 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 SO 21 0 2 2 0.095
2014-15 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 FR 22 3 3 6 0.273
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2014-15 · Franklin Pierce
+623.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#44381
Forward overall
#1637
Forward born in 1993
#1913
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Isac Nordström
New England College · 2016-17
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Joey Sollazzo
SUNY Potsdam · 2016-17
0.261 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brayden Fryfogle
Canton · 2023-24
0.478 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.