IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Evan Marek Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-06-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 — EHL 41 2 11 13 0.317 0.0733 0.0695 0.1552 0.1472
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 SR 26 1 5 6 0.231
2016-17 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 JR 23 4 2 6 0.261
2015-16 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 SO 21 0 2 2 0.095
2014-15 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 FR 22 3 3 6 0.273
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2014-15 · Franklin Pierce
+358.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#44581
Forward overall
#1646
Forward born in 1993
#1915
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Isac Nordström
New England College · 2016-17
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Joey Sollazzo
SUNY Potsdam · 2016-17
0.261 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Hintz
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2023-24
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.