IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Isac Nordström Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-07-05 Country: Sweden
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Okanagan European Eagles USPHL-Premier-Classic 43 9 10 19 0.442 0.1240 0.1196 0.3633 0.3504
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 New England College D3 LittleEast SR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 New England College D1 LittleEast JR 4 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 New England College D3 LittleEast JR 4 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 New England College D3 LittleEast SO 0 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 New England College D3 LittleEast FR 3 0 1 1 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2017-18 · New England College
+225.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#41924
Forward overall
#1863
Forward born in 1996
#188
in USPHL-Premier-Classic

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Egan Schmitt
Babson · 2021-22
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Luca Rea
Plymouth State · 2023-24
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Colford
Saint John's · 2014-15
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.