IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brody Power Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1993-06-27 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 North York Rangers OJHL 53 3 15 18 0.340 0.0832 0.0808 0.2325 0.2257
2013-14 North York Rangers OJHL 45 2 13 15 0.333 0.0817 0.0752 0.2281 0.2098
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC SR 26 0 4 4 0.154
2016-17 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC JR 27 1 15 16 0.593
2015-16 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC SO 26 1 13 14 0.538
2014-15 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC FR 27 1 5 6 0.222
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2014-15 · Buffalo State
+204.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16813
Defenseman overall
#1714
Defenseman born in 1993
#3343
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Zanin
Rivier · 2024-25
0.150 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Nate Foster
Nichols · 2016-17
0.188 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Lane Paddison
Manhattanville · 2021-22
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.