← New Search ↗ Social Card

Adam Pleskach Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-07-07 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Selkirk Steelers MJHL 61 13 15 28 0.459 0.0884 0.0959 0.2894 0.3140
2006-07 Selkirk Steelers MJHL 63 24 38 62 0.984 0.1894 0.1967 0.6206 0.6444
2007-08 Selkirk Steelers MJHL 62 52 56 108 1.742 0.3353 0.3301 1.0984 1.0813
2008-09 Selkirk Steelers MJHL 62 57 55 112 1.806 0.3478 0.3252 1.1392 1.0652
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 American International D1 AHA SR 35 15 17 32 0.914
2011-12 American International D1 AHA JR 37 16 13 29 0.784
2010-11 American International D1 AHA SO 33 13 15 28 0.849
2009-10 American International D1 AHA FR 33 15 10 25 0.758
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.76
2009-10 · American International
+170.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7805
Forward overall
#322
Forward born in 1988
#8
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Rivier · 2022-23
0.783 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2002-03
0.966 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2017-18
1.462 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.