IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Daniel Campbell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-05-21 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Mississauga Chargers OJHL 45 4 10 14 0.311 0.0763 0.0809 0.2139 0.2267
2012-13 — OJHL 28 4 7 11 0.393 0.0963 0.0930 0.2702 0.2610
2013-14 Burlington Cougars OJHL 48 11 27 38 0.792 0.1940 0.1775 0.5445 0.4981
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Salem State D3 MASCAC SR 26 3 13 16 0.615
2016-17 Salem State D3 MASCAC JR 24 3 15 18 0.750
2015-16 Salem State D3 MASCAC SO 25 6 17 23 0.920
2014-15 Salem State D3 MASCAC FR 14 0 2 2 0.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2014-15 · Salem State
+16.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#33835
Forward overall
#1184
Forward born in 1993
#1919
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jack Lewis
Lake Forest · 2012-13
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Hudson Cameron
Fredonia · 2024-25
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendon Gysbers
St. Norbert · 2017-18
0.871 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.