IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kerry McGlynn Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-11-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 St. Louis Jr. Blues NA3HL 37 12 6 18 0.486 0.0538 0.0561 0.1536 0.1600
2012-13 St. Louis Jr. Blues NA3HL 47 9 20 29 0.617 0.0682 0.0677 0.1948 0.1933
2013-14 Steinbach Pistons MJHL 58 2 12 14 0.241 0.0465 0.0447 0.1521 0.1461
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Hamline D3 MIAC SR 21 1 1 2 0.095
2016-17 Hamline D3 MIAC JR 25 0 2 2 0.080
2015-16 Hamline D3 MIAC SO 26 3 1 4 0.154
2014-15 Hamline D3 MIAC FR 21 1 0 1 0.048
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.05
2014-15 · Hamline
3.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#46761
Forward overall
#1738
Forward born in 1993

D1 Comparables

Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Steven Lecey
Nichols · 2011-12
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jimmy Morgan
Fredonia · 2014-15
0.762 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Bruce Stachitas
Stevenson · 2015-16
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.