IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Colin Clapton Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-11-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Boston Jr. Bandits EHL 24 7 7 14 0.583 0.1347 0.1302 0.2854 0.2760
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Salve Regina D1 CNE SR 25 8 6 14 0.560
2018-19 Salve Regina D3 CNE — 25 8 6 14 0.560
2017-18 Salve Regina D3 CNE — 30 13 8 21 0.700
2016-17 Salve Regina D3 CNE — 26 5 6 11 0.423
2015-16 Hobart D3 SUNYAC — 4 1 1 2 0.500
2014-15 Hobart D3 SUNYAC — 4 0 1 1 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2014-15 · Hobart
+124.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#27857
Forward overall
#957
Forward born in 1993
#789
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tristan Morin
Curry · 2016-17
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Camron Lowe
Elmira · 2023-24
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kenny Miller
Bryn Athyn · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.