← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kenny Miller Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-10-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Willmar WarHawks NA3HL 44 0 1 1 0.023 0.0025 0.0026 0.0072 0.0076
2015-16 NA3HL 44 1 4 5 0.114 0.0126 0.0126 0.0360 0.0361
2016-17 NA3HL 42 5 24 29 0.691 0.0764 0.0727 0.2188 0.2081
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Bryn Athyn D3 FR 6 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#20027
Defenseman overall
#2391
Defenseman born in 1996
#3351
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Potsdam · 2018-19
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Gustavus Adolphus · 2017-18
0.133 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Connecticut College · 2011-12
0.273 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.