← New Search ↗ Social Card

Charles Widmar Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-04-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Valley Jr. Warriors EHL 41 8 19 27 0.658 0.0963 0.0902 0.3229 0.3026
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 St. Olaf D3 MIAC SR 24 5 9 14 0.583
2016-17 St. Olaf D3 MIAC JR 6 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 St. Olaf D3 MIAC SO 17 0 2 2 0.118
2014-15 St. Olaf D3 MIAC FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#23470
Forward overall
#806
Forward born in 1993
#597
in EHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Concordia (WI) · 2011-12
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Boston · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2012-13
0.312 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.