IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Whitehair Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-04-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Rochester Jr. Americans USPHL-Premier-Classic 47 10 10 20 0.425 0.1194 0.1137 0.3498 0.3332
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 New England College D3 LittleEast SR 22 3 5 8 0.364
2017-18 New England College D3 LittleEast JR 25 7 12 19 0.760
2016-17 New England College D3 LittleEast SO 27 12 9 21 0.778
2015-16 New England College D3 LittleEast FR 26 6 11 17 0.654
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.65
2015-16 · New England College
+571.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#42818
Forward overall
#1717
Forward born in 1994
#196
in USPHL-Premier-Classic

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cade Helmer
University of New England · 2021-22
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jacob Brockman
Aurora · 2021-22
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jake Watchorn
Finlandia · 2009-10
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.