IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mikhail Bryan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-03-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Springfield Jr. Pics USPHL-Premier-Classic 39 2 5 7 0.179 0.0504 0.0477 0.1478 0.1398
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Suffolk D1 — SR 25 10 15 25 1.000
2018-19 Suffolk D3 CNE SR 25 10 15 25 1.000
2017-18 Suffolk D3 CNE JR 23 12 8 20 0.870
2016-17 Suffolk D3 CNE SO 23 2 7 9 0.391
2015-16 Suffolk D3 CNE FR 20 1 4 5 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2015-16 · Suffolk
+455.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#25926
Defenseman overall
#2457
Defenseman born in 1994
#326
in USPHL-Premier-Classic

D1 Comparables

Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tim Donohue
Gustavus Adolphus · 2013-14
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Angus Scott
Tufts · 2017-18
0.350 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Amraj Gill
Concordia (WI) · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.