← New Search ↗ Social Card

Angus Scott Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-03-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 8 0 1 1 0.125 0.0381 0.0430 0.9820 1.0728
2014-15 Lincoln Stars USHL 30 2 1 3 0.100 0.0615 0.0642 0.2946 0.3074
2015-16 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 59 15 22 37 0.627 0.2081 0.2107 0.5812 0.5884
2016-17 AJHL 53 15 26 41 0.774 0.2567 0.2474 0.7170 0.6910
2017-18 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 58 7 16 23 0.397 0.1571 0.1457 0.4164 0.3861
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Tufts D3 NESCAC SR 22 8 9 17 0.773
2020-21 Tufts D3 NESCAC JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Tufts D1 SO 24 3 7 10 0.417
2019-20 Tufts D3 NESCAC SO 24 3 7 10 0.417
2018-19 Tufts D1 FR 20 2 5 7 0.350
2018-19 Tufts D3 NESCAC FR 20 2 5 7 0.350
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2018-19 · Tufts
+119.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28105
Forward overall
#1287
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Fredonia · 2018-19
0.150 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2007-08
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2007-08
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.