IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jon Skarlis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-10-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 — NA3HL 40 6 6 12 0.300 0.0376 0.0375 0.0947 0.0945
2014-15 Valley Jr. Warriors EHL 18 4 1 5 0.278 0.0642 0.0621 0.1359 0.1315
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Bethel D1 MIAC SR 18 2 1 3 0.167
2018-19 Bethel D3 MIAC — 18 2 2 4 0.222
2017-18 Bethel D3 MIAC — 14 0 1 1 0.071
2016-17 Bethel D3 MIAC — 4 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 Worcester State D3 MASCAC — 13 2 1 3 0.231
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.23
2015-16 · Worcester State
+368.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#19500
Defenseman overall
#2084
Defenseman born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Derek Hammer
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2017-18
0.312 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Will Ahearn
Worcester State · 2017-18
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Mason Alderson
Castleton · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.