IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brad Peterson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-01-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 13 3 3 6 0.462 0.2837 0.2979 1.3597 1.4277
2003-04 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 46 9 17 26 0.565 0.3474 0.3464 1.6652 1.6606
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Bethel D3 — SR 25 10 15 25 1.000
2007-08 Bethel D3 — JR 25 13 17 30 1.200
2006-07 Bethel D3 — SO 29 9 12 21 0.724
2005-06 Bethel D3 — FR 25 12 14 26 1.040
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.04
2005-06 · Bethel
+271.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13792
Forward overall
#423
Forward born in 1985
#1367
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Andrew Poturalski
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Schempp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Joe Cox
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Michigan (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kevin Duane
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Boston University (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Papa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.72 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Pat Egan
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2013-14
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Geordan Buffoline
New England · 2017-18
1.667 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Bud Winter
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2017-18
1.091 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.