IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Braeden Pearl Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-07-15 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 North Bay Trappers NOJHL 19 1 3 4 0.210 0.0352 0.0364 0.0876 0.0907
2013-14 New Jersey Jr. Titans EHL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.0462 0.0462 0.0979 0.0980
2014-15 Swan Valley Stampeders MJHL 6 1 0 1 0.167 0.0321 0.0302 0.1051 0.0988
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Western New England D3 CNE — 12 1 1 2 0.167
2015-16 Western New England D3 CNE — 17 1 2 3 0.176
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.03
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2015-16 · Western New England
+463.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#57712
Forward overall
#2492
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Max Breon
Lawrence · 2022-23
0.143 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jason Eddy
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2012-13
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Latrell Charleson
Buffalo State · 2015-16
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.